-
1 scientific certainty
Общая лексика: научная достоверность, убеждение, основанное на научных данных -
2 certainty
[ʹsɜ:tntı] n1. несомненный фактscientific certainty - научная достоверность; убеждение, основанное на научных данных
2. уверенность3. разг. верный шанс, верняк4. мат. достоверность ( стопроцентная вероятность) -
3 certainty
сущ.1) мет., упр. определенность (ситуация, когда со 100% вероятностью, известно, какое событие произойдет)Ant:See:2) общ. уверенностьabsolute [dead\] certainty — полная уверенность
3) общ. несомненный факт4) общ. достоверность5) общ., разг. верный шанс*, верняк* (нечто или некто, от кого с большой вероятностью ожидается определенное действие, определенный результат и т. д.)* * *Достоверность. Уверенность.. . Словарь терминов по риск-медеджменту . -
4 certainty
1) мет., упр. определенность (ситуация, когда со 100% вероятностью, известно, какое событие произойдет)Ant:See:2) общ. уверенностьabsolute [dead] certainty — полная уверенность
3) общ. несомненный факт4) общ. достоверность5) общ., разг. верный шанс*, верняк* (нечто или некто, от кого с большой вероятностью ожидается определенное действие, определенный результат и т. д.)The new English-Russian dictionary of financial markets > certainty
-
5 certainty
n1) безперечний факт2) певність, упевненість* * *n2) упевненість3) вірний шанс4) мaт. вірогідність ( стовідсоткова ймовірність) -
6 certainty
-
7 certainty
ˈsə:tntɪ сущ.
1) несомненный факт
2) уверенность with certainty ≈ с уверенностью absolute, dead certainty ≈ полная уверенность moral certainty ≈ моральная устойчивость There is no certainty of success. ≈ Нет никакой уверенности в успехе. There is no certainty that an agreement will be reached. ≈ Нет уверенности, что будет достигнуто соглашение. Syn: confidence, certitude, conviction
3) достоверность logical certainty ≈ логическая достоверность mathematical certainty ≈ математическая достоверность несомненный факт;
- * of death неизбежность смерти;
- scientific * научная достоверность;
убеждение, основанное на научных данных;
- to know for a * знать наверняка уверенность;
- with * с уверенностью;
- I can't say with * не могу определенно сказать( разговорное) верный шанс, верняк;
- that horse is an absolute * эта лошадь - абсолютный веняк (математика) достоверность (стопроцентная вероятность) certainty достоверность ~ несомненный факт ~ уверенность;
I know for a certainty я знаю наверняка;
with certainty с уверенностью ~ уверенность;
I know for a certainty я знаю наверняка;
with certainty с уверенностью statistical ~ статистическая значимость ~ уверенность;
I know for a certainty я знаю наверняка;
with certainty с уверенностьюБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > certainty
-
8 principe de précaution
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Франко-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > principe de précaution
-
9 Vorsorgeprinzip
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Немецко-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > Vorsorgeprinzip
-
10 научная достоверность
1) General subject: scientific certainty2) Advertising: scientific credibilityУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > научная достоверность
-
11 убеждение, основанное на научных данных
General subject: scientific certaintyУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > убеждение, основанное на научных данных
-
12 принцип предосторожности
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-немецкий словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > принцип предосторожности
-
13 причина озабоченности
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-немецкий словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > причина озабоченности
-
14 принцип предосторожности
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-английский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > принцип предосторожности
-
15 причина озабоченности
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-английский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > причина озабоченности
-
16 принцип предосторожности
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-французский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > принцип предосторожности
-
17 причина озабоченности
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Русско-французский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > причина озабоченности
-
18 precautionary principle
принцип предосторожности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
precautionary principle
Principle adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (1992) that in order to protect the environment, a precautionary approach should be widely applied, meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage to the environment, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. (Source: GILP96)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Англо-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > precautionary principle
-
19 cause for concern principle
причина озабоченности
—
[ http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]EN
cause for concern principle
Principle connected with the precautionary principle: it means that, if there are strong reasons for expecting serious or irreversible damage to the environment following a given project, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation. Critics of this approach are concerned about large commitments of resources to deal with vaguely defined problems. (Source: GILP96a)
[http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/alphabetic?langcode=en]Тематики
EN
DE
FR
Англо-русский словарь нормативно-технической терминологии > cause for concern principle
-
20 Science
It is a common notion, or at least it is implied in many common modes of speech, that the thoughts, feelings, and actions of sentient beings are not a subject of science.... This notion seems to involve some confusion of ideas, which it is necessary to begin by clearing up. Any facts are fitted, in themselves, to be a subject of science, which follow one another according to constant laws; although those laws may not have been discovered, nor even to be discoverable by our existing resources. (Mill, 1900, B. VI, Chap. 3, Sec. 1)One class of natural philosophers has always a tendency to combine the phenomena and to discover their analogies; another class, on the contrary, employs all its efforts in showing the disparities of things. Both tendencies are necessary for the perfection of science, the one for its progress, the other for its correctness. The philosophers of the first of these classes are guided by the sense of unity throughout nature; the philosophers of the second have their minds more directed towards the certainty of our knowledge. The one are absorbed in search of principles, and neglect often the peculiarities, and not seldom the strictness of demonstration; the other consider the science only as the investigation of facts, but in their laudable zeal they often lose sight of the harmony of the whole, which is the character of truth. Those who look for the stamp of divinity on every thing around them, consider the opposite pursuits as ignoble and even as irreligious; while those who are engaged in the search after truth, look upon the other as unphilosophical enthusiasts, and perhaps as phantastical contemners of truth.... This conflict of opinions keeps science alive, and promotes it by an oscillatory progress. (Oersted, 1920, p. 352)Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone. (Einstein & Infeld, 1938, p. 27)A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. (Planck, 1949, pp. 33-34)[Original quotation: "Eine neue wissenschaftliche Wahrheit pflegt sich nicht in der Weise durchzusetzen, dass ihre Gegner ueberzeugt werden und sich as belehrt erklaeren, sondern vielmehr dadurch, dass die Gegner allmaehlich aussterben und dass die heranwachsende Generation von vornherein mit der Wahrheit vertraut gemacht ist." (Planck, 1990, p. 15)]I had always looked upon the search for the absolute as the noblest and most worth while task of science. (Planck, 1949, p. 46)If you cannot-in the long run-tell everyone what you have been doing, your doing has been worthless. (SchroЁdinger, 1951, pp. 7-8)Even for the physicist the description in plain language will be a criterion of the degree of understanding that has been reached. (Heisenberg, 1958, p. 168)The old scientific ideal of episteґmeґ-of absolutely certain, demonstrable knowledge-has proved to be an idol. The demand for scientific objectivity makes it inevitable that every scientific statement must remain tentative forever. It may indeed be corroborated, but every corroboration is relative to other statements which, again, are tentative. Only in our subjective experiences of conviction, in our subjective faith, can we be "absolutely certain." (Popper, 1959, p. 280)The layman, taught to revere scientists for their absolute respect for the observed facts, and for the judiciously detached and purely provisional manner in which they hold scientific theories (always ready to abandon a theory at the sight of any contradictory evidence) might well have thought that, at Miller's announcement of this overwhelming evidence of a "positive effect" [indicating that the speed of light is not independent from the motion of the observer, as Einstein's theory of relativity demands] in his presidential address to the American Physical Society on December 29th, 1925, his audience would have instantly abandoned the theory of relativity. Or, at the very least, that scientists-wont to look down from the pinnacle of their intellectual humility upon the rest of dogmatic mankind-might suspend judgment in this matter until Miller's results could be accounted for without impairing the theory of relativity. But no: by that time they had so well closed their minds to any suggestion which threatened the new rationality achieved by Einstein's world-picture, that it was almost impossible for them to think again in different terms. Little attention was paid to the experiments, the evidence being set aside in the hope that it would one day turn out to be wrong. (Polanyi, 1958, pp. 12-13)The practice of normal science depends on the ability, acquired from examplars, to group objects and situations into similarity sets which are primitive in the sense that the grouping is done without an answer to the question, "Similar with respect to what?" (Kuhn, 1970, p. 200)Science in general... does not consist in collecting what we already know and arranging it in this or that kind of pattern. It consists in fastening upon something we do not know, and trying to discover it. (Collingwood, 1972, p. 9)Scientific fields emerge as the concerns of scientists congeal around various phenomena. Sciences are not defined, they are recognized. (Newell, 1973a, p. 1)This is often the way it is in physics-our mistake is not that we take our theories too seriously, but that we do not take them seriously enough. I do not think it is possible really to understand the successes of science without understanding how hard it is-how easy it is to be led astray, how difficult it is to know at any time what is the next thing to be done. (Weinberg, 1977, p. 49)Science is wonderful at destroying metaphysical answers, but incapable of providing substitute ones. Science takes away foundations without providing a replacement. Whether we want to be there or not, science has put us in a position of having to live without foundations. It was shocking when Nietzsche said this, but today it is commonplace; our historical position-and no end to it is in sight-is that of having to philosophize without "foundations." (Putnam, 1987, p. 29)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Science
- 1
- 2
См. также в других словарях:
certainty — noun (plural ties) Date: 14th century 1. something that is certain 2. the quality or state of being certain especially on the basis of evidence Synonyms: certainty, certitude, conviction mean a state of being free from doubt. certainty … New Collegiate Dictionary
Scientific opinion on climate change — This article is about scientific opinion on climate change. For public perception and controversy about the scientific consensus, see Public opinion on climate change and Global warming controversy. For opinions of individual dissenting… … Wikipedia
Scientific method — … Wikipedia
Scientific revolution — This article is about a period in the history of science. For the process of scientific progress via revolution, proposed by Thomas Kuhn, see Paradigm shift … Wikipedia
Scientific Revolution — The period which many historians of science call the Scientific Revolution can be roughly dated as having begun in 1543, the year in which Nicolaus Copernicus published his De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly… … Wikipedia
History of scientific method — The history of scientific method is inseparable from the history of science itself. The development and elaboration of rules for scientific reasoning and investigation has not been straightforward; scientific method has been the subject of… … Wikipedia
Models of scientific inquiry — In the philosophy of science, models of scientific inquiry have two functions: first, to provide a descriptive account of how scientific inquiry is carried out in practice, and second, to provide an explanatory account of why scientific inquiry… … Wikipedia
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming — This is an incomplete list, which may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with reliably sourced entries … Wikipedia
On Certainty — Part of a series on … Wikipedia
philosophy, Western — Introduction history of Western philosophy from its development among the ancient Greeks to the present. This article has three basic purposes: (1) to provide an overview of the history of philosophy in the West, (2) to relate… … Universalium
Precautionary principle — The precautionary principle is a moral and political principle which states that if an action or policy might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not… … Wikipedia
